ROOT / MAPDECODED / PROJECTIONS LIVE: NASA VIIRS · 2 PROJECTIONS
Projections // Decoded

There is no correct
way to flatten Earth.

A globe is curved; a screen is not. Every world map ever drawn has to break something — area, shape, distance or direction — to make that transfer. Below, the same live NASA imagery rendered two different ways, then the ten great projections and exactly what each one sacrifices.

2
Live projections
10
Projections decoded
550%
Mercator's Greenland error
0
Distortion-free maps
// Same planet, same day

Live NASA imagery, two projections

Identical VIIRS true-color data. Watch the poles stretch in one and settle in the other.

Mercator (EPSG:3857) — the navigator's map. Straight compass courses, but Greenland balloons to 550% of its true size.
Geographic / Equirectangular (EPSG:4326) — latitude and longitude as a plain grid. Simple and honest about position, but stretches everything east–west toward the poles.

> loading NASA imagery…

// The catalog

Ten ways to flatten a planet

What each projection preserves — and what it destroys to do it.

// The mathematics

Why it is impossible

A sphere has intrinsic curvature; a flat plane has none. Gauss proved in 1827 — his Theorema Egregium, the "remarkable theorem" — that you cannot flatten a curved surface onto a plane without stretching it. Peel an orange and try to press the skin flat: it tears. That tear is every world map ever made.

So cartographers choose what to save. Conformal projections (Mercator) preserve local shape and angle, which is why they won the age of sail — and why they wildly inflate the poles. Equal-area projections (Gall-Peters, Cylindrical Equal Area) preserve true size, and pay for it by squashing shape. Compromise projections (Robinson, Winkel Tripel) distort everything slightly rather than anything badly, which is why they look "right" to us.

The politics follow the mathematics. A Mercator classroom map makes Europe and North America look far larger than the equatorial world; that is the argument Arno Peters made in the 1970s when he pushed his equal-area map as a corrective. Neither map lies on purpose — each simply chose a different thing to protect.